![]() ![]() ![]() Then there were the videos that slipped past the stricter standards YouTube has for its Kids app: amateur versions of cartoons featuring well-known characters with weirdly unsettling narrative third acts. There was the controversy about popular vlogger PewDiePie, condemned for including anti-Semitic humor and Nazi imagery in his videos. YouTube weathered a series of controversies last year, many of which were about children, both their exploitation and their vulnerability as audiences. Content moderation, and different kinds of responsibility This needs to change, and it is beginning to.īut in this crucial moment, one that affords such a clear opportunity to fundamentally reimagine how platforms work and what we can expect of them, we might want to get our stories straight about what those expectations should be. They all engage in content moderation but are not obligated to they do it largely out of sight of public scrutiny and are held to no official standards as to how they do so. In the shadow of this protection, they have constructed baroque moderation mechanisms: flagging, review teams, crowd workers, automatic detection tools, age barriers, suspensions, verification status, external consultants, blocking tools. For too long, platforms have enjoyed generous legal protections and an equally generous cultural allowance: to be “mere conduits” not liable for what users post to them. The controversy surrounding Paul and his video highlights the undeniable need, now more than ever, to reconsider the public responsibilities of social media platforms. YouTube went on to strip Paul from its top-tier monetization system, and announced yesterday that Paul would face “further consequences.” He later announced he would be taking a break from YouTube. A somewhat more heartfelt video apology followed. Paul’s reactions were self-centered and cruel.Īfter a blistering wave of criticism in the comment threads and on Twitter, Paul removed the video and issued a written apology, which was itself criticized for not striking the right tone. The video lingered on the body, including close-ups of his swollen hand. Rather than turning off the camera, Paul continued his antics, pinballing between awe and irreverence, showing the body up close and then turning the attention back to his own reaction. But he faced public backlash after posting a video in which he and his buddies ventured into the Aokigahara Forest of Japan, sometimes called the “suicide forest,” only to find the body of a young man who appeared to have recently hanged himself. Paul’s videos, a relentless barrage of boasts, pranks, and stunts, have garnered him legions of adoring fans. Last week, Logan Paul, a 22-year-old YouTube star with 15 million-plus subscribers, posted a controversial video that brought these questions into focus. TV4, public broadcaster SVT and news agency TT were among the Swedish media who received the news release by email at 7:31 a.m., just over four hours ahead of the scheduled prize announcement at 11:45 a.m.What do we expect of content moderation? And what do we expect of platforms? And in 2010, Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet published the name of the medicine winner in advance. The literature prize, in a particular, was plagued by leaks in recent decades. It is not the first time the names of winners slip out before the Nobel announcements. The academy stopped the practice since the awards were being announced simultaneously on the digital platforms of the Nobel Prizes. The courier would be connected to the academy by phone and wait for a cue to hand over the envelope at the moment the prize committee started reading the names of the winners. Until just under a decade ago, the academy sent a courier to AP and other news agencies carrying an envelope with the names of the winners. “But in the electronic era the leaks can occur in different ways than in the newspaper era.” “It is an important principle that the prize winners are the first to find out, and that everyone else finds out afterward at the same time,” the former head of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Göran Hansson, told news agency TT. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |